Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
Shop deviantART for the
holidays and save BIG!
Click here! :holly:
[x]

deviantART

:woohoo:
 

In the news

Wed Jul 5, 2006, 7:57 PM
|| My Friends || Clubs ||


So three drunk guys pissed on the Canadian National War Memorial in Ottawa. Their actions are under review. To be honest, their punishment should be to have 12 war veterans piss on them. Disrespectful fuckers.

North Korea tested 7 intercontinental ballistic missles (ICBM's) shortly after the space shuttle launched on July 4. For some reason, that's a bad thing, says prezzie Bush. So let me get this straight; the leader of a country which has enough nuclear weapons to destroy the moon, and the means to deliver them via ICBM's, is bitching because a much smaller country has created a similar weapon that, mind you, failed 2 seconds after launch. Also, keep in mind, that this country has not yet attained the ability to create nuclear weapons, but are on their way. Can you say hypocracy?

I had another thing I saw in the news today to bitch about, but I can't remember.

Cheers.

Devious Comments

love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconmoonysun:
china, u.s.a, and russia are very glad with this situation : Korea divided in two parts, old fucking 20th century fight between the communists and the capitalism, yet all together agree to keep this as it is, so they can sell weapons, yea, massive & destructive weapons, it's a shame, the 38 parralele separating Korea in two is a shame, but hey ! It's good for the Bizness...
:iconrefemall:
Yeah, but that's not what I'm getting at. I'm asking what right the US has to condemn N. Korea for constructing these types of weapons, when they themselves have more functional ones than any other country.

--
Member of: These Clubs
:iconmoonysun:
OK, so we're talking about the same thing.
US have no rights, the 5 permanent nations on U.N ( HA! US, France, U.K, china, I don't even know who they are but I know for sure they are the 5 BEST WAR TOY SELLERS) have no rights, except the right to sell dead-toys .
You better understand this : To make money rebuilding a country, you shall first destroyed it...
:iconrefemall:
Honestly, I'm not sure we are talking about the same thing. My comment has nothing to do with destroying/rebuilding a country. I will agree that the top five in the UN are probably the most dangerous in terms of sheer quantity of weapons of mass destruction.

Take, for example, the act of the US invading Iraq, with plenty of 'concrete evidence' that Iraq had WMD's. Now, however many months later, have they found a single one? No!

How many WMD's does the US have, though? Plenty.

Again, hypocracy at work.

--
Member of: These Clubs
:iconlovetour:
hey - thanks for the welcome! I have no idea how you knew I just registered, but yay :)

I know, the US is a hypocritical bully.
Our (meaning my country's) war-mongering and resistance to international peace efforts for going on decades now, while condeming any efforts to build military strength elsewhere in the world pisses me off. Oh, I believe a less militarized world with better international cooperation is a better world. But that's not the US aim. The US aim is word domination.

Journal History

Site Map